Op-ed

South Works Quantum Campus Promise and Tension

A first-of-its-kind quantum campus is rising on a long-dead steel site. The promise is real, and so is the worry that the Southeast Side gets the disruption without the dividend.

· By the Sell Chicago Properties Editorial Team · 8 min read

Chicago industrial and waterfront buildings near the Southeast Side lakefront
Illustrative photo of Chicago waterfront industry, not the South Works quantum site itself.

A different megaproject, and not the one downtown

It is worth saying clearly at the top, because the city has several huge plans in motion at once. This is not the downtown riverfront project near the South Loop. This is the Illinois Quantum and Microelectronics Park, sometimes called Quantum Shore Chicago, rising on the former U.S. Steel South Works site on the Southeast Side along the lakefront.

The plan, led by Related Midwest and CRG, covers roughly 440 acres, anchoring a quantum innovation campus of about 128 acres whose first construction phase reporting describes as roughly 30 acres. The anchor tenant is PsiQuantum, a company aiming to build the first utility-scale quantum computer in the United States, with IBM and other quantum and microelectronics firms also committed to the park.

Public reporting describes a ceremonial groundbreaking on the site in the fall of 2025, with steel rising through 2026 and a first phase, including office space, a data hall, and a cryogenic plant to cool the equipment, targeted for completion around 2027. PsiQuantum has described an investment in the range of more than a billion dollars, supported by a package of state and local incentives reported in the hundreds of millions over its term.

Watch: how an investor-led property review actually works.

Why this land carries weight

South Works was once one of the great steel mills of America, employing thousands and anchoring the economy of the Southeast Side. When it closed, it left behind a vast lakefront wound that sat mostly empty for decades, a stretch of cleared and contaminated ground that swallowed redevelopment plan after redevelopment plan.

For the neighborhoods around it, South Chicago and the broader Southeast Side, that emptiness has been a daily reminder of jobs that left and never came back. So a project promising thousands of jobs and billions in investment is not a small thing here. It is the most serious shot at reuse this land has had in a generation.

That is exactly why the stakes feel so high to the people who live closest. When a place has been promised renewal before and watched it evaporate, skepticism is not negativity. It is experience.

Moving boxes in a home being sold, illustrative
Moving boxes in a home being sold. Illustrative photo.

The tension is real, and worth taking seriously

Not everyone nearby is celebrating. Organizers, including a group called Southside Together, gathered signatures to put a nonbinding referendum on the ballot asking whether elected leaders should stop the quantum park and pursue resident-led alternatives instead. Their stated concerns centered on displacement, pollution, energy costs, and a lack of community input before the project was announced.

Here is the honest status, because it matters. Reporting indicates the Chicago Board of Election Commissioners ruled in January 2026 that the petition violated state election code by containing more than one question, so it did not appear on the March primary ballot. Organizers then said they would pursue a new November ballot effort. Whether that later effort qualified or succeeded was not confirmed as of mid-2026, and we are not going to overstate it.

We take the substance of the worry seriously even where we are optimistic about the project. A campus that cools quantum hardware draws real power, sits on ground that needs environmental remediation, and rises next to neighborhoods that cannot afford to be priced out of their own recovery. Those are not reasons to stop. They are the terms that have to be met.

How a megaproject can actually benefit the Southeast Side

We are investors and advisors, not boosters, and our view is simple. A project this large can be a genuine engine for the Southeast Side, but only if the benefits are written down and enforceable rather than assumed.

That means local hiring with real targets and training pipelines into construction and the permanent technical and operations roles, so paychecks land in the surrounding zip codes and not only with people who commute in. It means a binding community benefits framework negotiated with residents, covering affordable housing, anti-displacement protections, and reinvestment in nearby schools and small businesses. And it means transparent environmental remediation of a site that carries a heavy industrial legacy, with the cleanup standards and the energy plan made public rather than buried.

  • Local hiring targets covering both construction and permanent campus jobs
  • Training pipelines that connect Southeast Side residents to technical roles
  • A binding community benefits framework, negotiated with residents, not announced at them
  • Affordable housing and anti-displacement protections written into the deal
  • Transparent environmental remediation and a public energy plan for the campus
Downtown Chicago at street level, illustrative
Downtown Chicago at street level. Illustrative photo.

Our opinion on getting it right

The promise of this project is not abstract. A working quantum campus on a dead steel site would put the Southeast Side at the center of an industry the whole country is racing to build, and that kind of anchor can pull in suppliers, housing demand, and a tax base the area has lacked for forty years.

But anchors only lift the neighborhoods around them when the deal is structured to share the gains. The difference between a project that revives the Southeast Side and one that merely happens next to it comes down to enforceable commitments, honest remediation, and a seat at the table for the residents who stayed through the empty decades.

Our position is that the community concerns and the project's promise are not opposites. The way you honor the promise is by meeting the concerns in writing. Do that, and this becomes a model for how a hard, contaminated, long-abandoned site turns into shared prosperity. Skip it, and a remarkable opportunity becomes one more thing built over a community rather than with it.

What this means if you own nearby

A campus of this size changes the calculus for owners across the Southeast Side. Land values, holding decisions, and the right time to sell all move when billions in investment start to flow into a corridor that has been quiet for decades. Early movement creates both opportunity and the risk of being priced or timed out of your own decision.

If you own a property near the South Works corridor and want a clear, current read on value and your options, you can request an offer or learn more about what we do as investors and advisors focused on this side of the city.

Own near the South Works corridor

If a megaproject is reshaping value near your property, we can help you read the market and weigh your options.

See what we do

Frequently asked questions

What is the quantum campus at South Works

It is the Illinois Quantum and Microelectronics Park, a roughly 440-acre redevelopment of the former U.S. Steel South Works site on Chicago's Southeast Side, with a first-phase quantum campus anchored by PsiQuantum and joined by IBM and other firms.

Is this the same as the downtown riverfront project

No. This is a separate project on the Southeast Side lakefront at the former South Works steel site, not the downtown South Loop riverfront development, and the two should not be confused.

Did residents vote to stop the campus

A group of organizers gathered signatures for a nonbinding referendum, but reporting indicates the election board ruled in January 2026 that the petition violated state code and kept it off the March ballot. Organizers said they would pursue a November effort, and its status was not confirmed as of mid-2026.

This article reflects our opinion as real estate investors and advisors and is not legal, tax, or investment advice; verify project details with the cited primary sources.